Finally, the gendered effects of neoliberalism are illustrated by examining the situation of Canadian farm women. It links the neoliberal policy regime to its environmental consequences at the meso level of Canadian agricultural production. At the macro level, it questions the neoliberal discourse of “efficiency” by using trade data to illustrate the environmental inefficiencies of the current trade regime, especially the phenomenon of “trade for trade’s sake”. The analysis moves through three levels of inquiry – macro, meso, and micro – to examine the interaction of neoliberal policy, gender, and environment. It uses a feminist political economy framework to analyze newly released statistical data on international trade flows from the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), as well as statistics on Canadian agricultural production. This chapter challenges the economism of contemporary macroeconomic policy through an environmental and gendered lens. The article concludes by using the paradigm of environmental justice to outline the elements of a more equitable and sustainable approach to international trade law and policy that supports the livelihoods of indigenous and rural communities and protects the planet's finite natural resources. The article urges policy-makers to integrate trade, human rights, and environmental policy instead of criminalizing immigrants or militarizing the U.S.-Mexican border. Critiquing Mexico's neoliberal economic reforms through the framework of environmental justice, the article highlights some of the theoretical and practical limitations of the theory of comparative advantage, which serves as the justification for the free market economic policies promoted by international trade and financial institutions. Using Mexico as a case study, the article examines the impact of trade liberalization on indigenous peoples and on the environment. Unless this template is fundamentally restructured, future trade agreements may replicate throughout the Western hemisphere many of the economic, ecological and social dislocations experienced under NAFTA. Despite these negative impacts, NAFTA continues to serve as a template for trade agreements in the Americas. Stanton.The free market reforms adopted by Mexico in the wake of the debt crisis of the 1980s and in connection with the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) have jeopardized the physical and cultural survival of Mexico’s indigenous peoples, increased migration to the United States, threatened biological diversity in Mexico, and imposed additional stress on the environment in the United States. Projections of Structural Change and the Future of American Agriculture ,Kent D. Farm Structure and Stewardship of the Environment ,Jay Dee Atwood and A. Structural Change in Farming and Its Relationship to Rural Communities ,Thomas A. The Structure of Families and Changes in Farm Organization and Structure ,L. Empirical Analysis of Tenure Patterns and Farm Structure ,Larry Janssen. Structural Diversity Under Risk: Choice of Durable Assets ,Lindon J. A Changing Food and Agribusiness Sector: Its Impacts on Farm Structure ,Michael A. Structural Implications of Agricultural Finance ,Cole R. Implications of Tax Policy for Farm Structure ,Joseph A. Government Commodity Program Impacts on Farm Numbers ,Luther G. Technology and Its Impact on American Agriculture ,Marvin T. Micro-Level Agricultural Data Collected and Managed by the Federal Government ,James D. Use of Firm-Level Agricultural Data Collected and Managed at the State Level for Studying Farm Size Issues ,George L. Why Are Some Farms More Successful Than Others? A Review ,Glenn Fox, Philip A. Empirical Studies of Size, Structure, and Efficiency in Agriculture ,A. Economies of Size: Theory, Measurement, and Related Issues ,A. The Production Cost-Size Relationship: Measurement Issues and Estimates for Three Major Crops ,Mary C. Recent Changes in Size and Structure of Agriculture: A Study of Selected States in the North Central Region ,Robert H. Changes in Farm Size and Structure in American Agriculture in the Twentieth Century ,B. The Structure of Agriculture in an Historical Context ,Wayne D. Farm Structure: Concept and Definition ,B. The Importance of Size and Structure in U.S.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |